Why this category is central
Causation frameworks
Bradford Hill evaluations
- Hill criteria evaluation: Hardell L, Carlberg M (2013; 2017). Evaluations of mobile and cordless phone use and glioma risk using Bradford Hill viewpoints. BioMed Research International (2017):9218486.
- Review: Davis DL, Kesari S, Soskolne CL, Miller AB, Stein Y (2013). Swedish Review Strengthens Grounds for Concluding RF Radiation Is a Probable Human Carcinogen. Pathophysiology 20(2):123–129.
Meta-analyses
Aggregated analyses of tumour risk
- Meta-analysis: Bortkiewicz A, Gadzicka E, Szymczak W (2017). Mobile Phone Use and Risk for Intracranial Tumors. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 30(1):27–43.
- Systematic review: Prasad M, Kathuria P, Nair P, et al. (2017). Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Brain Tumours: Study Quality, Funding, and Outcomes. Neurological Sciences 38(5):797–810.
- Review: Bielsa-Fernández P, Rodríguez-Martín B (2018). Association Between Radiation from Mobile Phones and Tumour Risk in Adults. Gaceta Sanitaria 32(1):81–91.
Mechanistic and experimental evidence
Proposed pathways to tumour promotion
- Mechanistic chapter: Pall ML (2018). How Cancer Can Be Caused by Microwave Frequency EMF Exposures. In: Mobile Communications and Public Health (CRC Press).
- Review: Yakymenko I, Sidorik E, Kyrylenko S, Chekhun V (2011). Long-Term Exposure to Microwave Radiation Provokes Cancer Growth. Experimental Oncology 33(2):62–70.
- Review: Carpenter DO (2010; 2013). EMFs and cancer risk discussions in Reviews on Environmental Health.
Study quality & funding
Funding source and reported outcomes
- Prasad M et al. (2017) — Analysis of study quality and funding.
- Hardell L (2017). WHO and RF radiation critique.
Interpretation boundaries
Points of ongoing debate
Where to go next
Explore another study category, or step back to the Evidence Landscape for how study design and exposure modelling shape conclusions.